Psoriasis research record

What do registered trials show for psoriasis?

23 treatments have a posted result against a comparison group. The exact treatment and comparison numbers are below.

The guide helps with care decisions. This page is the supporting trial record.

01

Treatment results

These treatments have at least one completed trial that posted a result against a comparison group — the only kind of result that can show the treatment itself made the difference. Each card is one trial against its own comparator, so cards can’t be compared head-to-head. Every result-posting study in the record was scanned, not just recent ones. A “vehicle” is the same cream or gel without the active ingredient — the fairest comparison for a topical.

ixekizumab

83 more people per 100 reached clear or almost-clear skin at week 12.

Outcome: Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) With at Least a 2 Point Improvement · NCT03364309 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry-run

bimekizumab

81.3 more people per 100 reached at least 90% less psoriasis severity at week 16.

Serious adverse events in this trial: 0 of 32 on treatment vs 1 of 15 in the comparison group (submitted counts).

Outcome: Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16 · NCT05020249 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry-run · published: Youn SW et al.

Adalimumab

66.3 more people per 100 reached at least 75% less psoriasis severity at week 12.

Outcome: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Greater Than or Equal to 75% Reduction (PASI 75) Response at Week 12 · NCT01646073 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry-run

brodalumab

63.2 more people per 100 reached the trial’s improvement bar at 12 weeks.

Serious adverse events in this trial: 10 of 629 on treatment vs 3 of 315 in the comparison group (submitted counts).

Outcome: Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 12 · NCT01708629 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry-run

Roflumilast

36.3 more people per 100 reached clear or almost-clear skin at baseline (day 1) and week 8.

Serious adverse events in this trial: 2 of 286 on treatment vs 1 of 153 in the comparison group (submitted counts).

Outcome: Number of Participants Achieving Success in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Scale Assessment of Disease Severity at Week 8 · NCT04211363 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry-run

15 more treatments have a comparative result — marked in the full treatment list below.

Where the comparison did as well — or better

Before paying more for a newer option, check whether it beat the alternative in its own trial. In these primary outcomes, it didn’t:

Every study with posted results in this record

37 registered psoriasis studies posted numeric results that this index maps to a treatment. Each has its own page showing exactly what was submitted, group by group.

Did a more expensive option beat the alternative?

Head-to-head: when treatments faced each other

Most trials compare against a placebo or vehicle. These posted outcomes compared one active treatment with another — the comparison that actually answers “which one?”:

  • Secukinumab 300mg (2 x 150 mg) 66.5% vs Ustekinumab 2 x 45mg or 90mg 48%Week 12 · primary outcome · NCT02826603secukinumab
  • Secukinumab 300mg (2 x 150 mg) 72.2% vs Ustekinumab 2 x 45mg or 90mg 55.4%Week 12 · primary outcome · NCT02826603secukinumab
  • Ustekinumab 2 x 45mg or 90mg 48% vs Secukinumab 300mg (2 x 150 mg) 66.5%Week 12 · primary outcome · NCT02826603Ustekinumab
  • Ustekinumab 2 x 45mg or 90mg 55.4% vs Secukinumab 300mg (2 x 150 mg) 72.2%Week 12 · primary outcome · NCT02826603Ustekinumab
  • Enbrel (Etanercept) 62.3% vs CHS-0214 64.5%12-weeks · primary outcome · NCT02134210Etanercept
  • Enbrel (Etanercept) -73.4% vs CHS-0214 -76.7%12 Weeks · primary outcome · NCT02134210Etanercept
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks (RS) 81.9% vs Ustekinumab (RS) 55.8%Week 52 · secondary outcome · NCT03370133bimekizumab
  • Bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks (RS) 78.2% vs Ustekinumab (RS) 60.7%Week 52 · secondary outcome · NCT03370133bimekizumab

Same molecule, different price tag

Regulatory status of the tracked treatments — whether the molecule studied in the trials above is available over the counter, as a generic, or brand-only. 6 of them have an OTC, generic, or biosimilar route.

TreatmentStatusUnited StatesCanada
calcipotriene (calcipotriol) (Dovonex, Sorilux)Calcipotriene (US name) and calcipotriol (international name) are the same vitamin D analog.Generic prescription availableGeneric calcipotriene cream, ointment, and solution are available by prescription; also sold in combination with betamethasone (Taclonex and generics). sourceKnown as calcipotriol in Canada (Dovonex and combinations); prescription-only. source
desoximetasone (Topicort)Generic desoximetasone products contain the same corticosteroid as the Topicort brand.Generic prescription availablePrescription corticosteroid available as generic creams, ointments, gels, and sprays. sourceAvailable by prescription in Canada (Topicort and others). source
methotrexate (Trexall, Otrexup, Rasuvo)Methotrexate for psoriasis is the same generic molecule used in rheumatology and oncology, at different doses.Generic prescription availableOral tablets and injectable forms are long-established prescription generics. sourceGeneric methotrexate tablets and injections are available by prescription in Canada. source
adalimumab (Humira, Amjevita, Hyrimoz)Biosimilar versions of adalimumab are approved, highly similar alternatives to Humira available in both markets.Biosimilar availableHumira plus multiple FDA-approved biosimilars (e.g., Amjevita, Hyrimoz, Hadlima) have been marketed since 2023; biosimilars are approved alternatives, not generics. sourceHumira and several Health Canada-approved adalimumab biosimilars are marketed in Canada. source
etanercept (Enbrel, Erelzi, Brenzys)Etanercept biosimilars are approved in both countries but are actually sold only in Canada; in the US, Enbrel remains the only available version until patent expiry.Biosimilar availableOnly Enbrel is sold in the US; FDA-approved biosimilars (Erelzi, Eticovo) cannot launch until Enbrel patents expire (around 2029). sourceEtanercept biosimilars (Brenzys, Erelzi) are marketed in Canada alongside Enbrel. source
ustekinumab (Stelara, Wezlana, Selarsdi)Biosimilar versions of ustekinumab became available in the US in 2025 and are also approved in Canada.Biosimilar availableStelara plus multiple FDA-approved biosimilars (Wezlana, Selarsdi, Pyzchiva, Yesintek and others) launched during 2025; some are designated interchangeable. sourceHealth Canada-approved ustekinumab biosimilars are marketed alongside Stelara. source
apremilast (Otezla)Apremilast is a small-molecule tablet but currently has no marketed US generic.Brand-only prescriptionOtezla tablets are brand-only by prescription; no generic is currently marketed in the US. sourceOtezla is available by prescription in Canada. source
crisaborole (Eucrisa)Unlike tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, crisaborole has no generic; all products are the Eucrisa brand.Brand-only prescriptionEucrisa 2% ointment is prescription-only; no generic is available. sourceEucrisa has been available in Canada since 2018; prescription-only, no generic. source
deucravacitinib (Sotyktu)Deucravacitinib is available only as the brand Sotyktu.Brand-only prescriptionSotyktu tablets (approved 2022) are prescription-only; no generic. sourceSotyktu is marketed in Canada by prescription. source
roflumilast (Zoryve, Daliresp)The brand-only psoriasis cream and the generic COPD tablet contain the same molecule in different strengths and routes.Brand-only prescriptionTopical roflumilast (Zoryve cream and foam) is brand-only by prescription; oral roflumilast (Daliresp), approved for COPD, is generic. sourceZoryve cream (2023) and foam are approved by Health Canada; prescription-only. source
ruxolitinib (Opzelura, Jakafi, Jakavi)The same molecule is sold as the Opzelura skin cream and as oral tablets (Jakafi in the US, Jakavi in Canada) for different diseases.Brand-only prescriptionOpzelura 1.5% cream is prescription-only and brand-only; the same molecule is sold as oral tablets (Jakafi) for blood disorders. sourceOpzelura cream authorized by Health Canada in October 2024 for atopic dermatitis and vitiligo; prescription-only. source
tapinarof (Vtama, Nduvra)Vtama (US) and Nduvra (Canada) contain the same tapinarof molecule under different brand names.Brand-only prescriptionVtama 1% cream (psoriasis 2022, atopic dermatitis 2024) is brand-only by prescription. sourceApproved by Health Canada in April 2025 under the brand Nduvra for plaque psoriasis; prescription-only. source
bimekizumab (Bimzelx)Bimekizumab is available only as the brand Bimzelx.Biologic — brand onlyBimzelx (approved 2023) is a prescription biologic; no biosimilar. sourceBimzelx is marketed in Canada by prescription (approved 2022). source
brodalumab (Siliq)Brodalumab is available only as the brand Siliq in North America.Biologic — brand onlySiliq is a prescription biologic dispensed under a REMS safety program; no biosimilar. sourceMarketed as Siliq in Canada by prescription. source
certolizumab pegol (Cimzia)Certolizumab pegol is available only as the brand Cimzia.Biologic — brand onlyCimzia injection is a prescription biologic; no biosimilar. sourceCimzia is marketed in Canada by prescription. source
guselkumab (Tremfya)Guselkumab is available only as the brand Tremfya.Biologic — brand onlyTremfya is a prescription biologic; no biosimilar. sourceTremfya is marketed in Canada by prescription. source
ixekizumab (Taltz)Ixekizumab is available only as the brand Taltz.Biologic — brand onlyTaltz is a prescription biologic; no biosimilar. sourceTaltz is marketed in Canada by prescription. source
risankizumab (Skyrizi)Risankizumab is available only as the brand Skyrizi.Biologic — brand onlySkyrizi is a prescription biologic; no biosimilar. sourceSkyrizi is marketed in Canada by prescription. source
secukinumab (Cosentyx)Secukinumab is available only as the brand Cosentyx in North America.Biologic — brand onlyCosentyx is a prescription biologic; no biosimilar is marketed in the US. sourceCosentyx is marketed in Canada by prescription. source
tildrakizumab (Ilumya)Tildrakizumab is available only as the brand Ilumya in North America.Biologic — brand onlyIlumya is a prescription biologic; no biosimilar. sourceMarketed as Ilumya in Canada by prescription. source
gsk2982772GSK2982772 never advanced beyond clinical trials and is not available anywhere.Investigational — not approvedInvestigational RIPK1 inhibitor; psoriasis trials did not meet efficacy goals and development was discontinued; never approved. sourcenot verified
piclidenosonCF101 is the development code for piclidenoson, which remains investigational worldwide.Investigational — not approvedInvestigational oral A3 adenosine receptor agonist (piclidenoson) in phase 3 psoriasis trials; not approved in any market. sourcenot verified

Regulatory status only, verified 2026-08-20 with one source per claim — not pricing, coverage, or a recommendation. Status can change; check the linked source.

Find one of 272 tracked treatments

Search by brand or generic name, or browse the 60 most-studied terms. They are ordered by what the public record can show, not by benefit or safety.

secukinumabBiologic — brand only14 comparative results · 51 result-posting studies scanned69 linked records · 45 of 57 completed posted results

At Week 12, 66.5% of people in the Secukinumab 300mg (2 x 150 mg) group had the submitted improvement result (Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 12), compared with 48% in the Ustekinumab 2 x 45mg or 90mg group—18.5 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT02826603 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs another active treatment · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 45 years (submitted means covering 16,624 participants).
  • 33% of 19,347 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 11 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
EtanerceptBiosimilar available3 comparative results · 37 result-posting studies scanned61 linked records · 33 of 48 completed posted results

At 12-weeks, 62.3% of people in the Enbrel (Etanercept) group had the submitted improvement result (Proportion of Subjects Achieving PASI-75(75% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) From Baseline at Week 12), compared with 64.5% in the CHS-0214 group—2.2 fewer people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT02134210 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs another active treatment

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 42.5 years (submitted means covering 7,594 participants).
  • 33% of 13,175 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 7 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
AdalimumabBiosimilar available1 comparative result · 32 result-posting studies scanned53 linked records · 30 of 46 completed posted results

At Week 12, 77.8% of people in the Adalimumab Eow group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants Achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Greater Than or Equal to 75% Reduction (PASI 75) Response at Week 12), compared with 11.5% in the Placebo group—66.3 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT01646073 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44 years (submitted means covering 7,397 participants).
  • 31% of 10,967 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 10 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
UstekinumabBiosimilar available4 comparative results · 33 result-posting studies scanned50 linked records · 30 of 37 completed posted results

At 12 Weeks, 21.7% of people in the Ustekinumab group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 100 at Week 12), compared with 0.6% in the Placebo group—21.1 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT01708603 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 45 years (submitted means covering 9,993 participants).
  • 33% of 13,472 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 8 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
apremilastBrand-only prescription1 comparative result · 24 result-posting studies scanned45 linked records · 24 of 36 completed posted results

At Baseline and week 16, 73.3% of people in the Apremilast 30 mg group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 4-point Reduction From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16), compared with 41.3% in the Placebo group—32 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT03774875 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 4 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 16

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 45.3 years (submitted means covering 6,407 participants).
  • 36% of 6,419 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 9 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
ixekizumabBiologic — brand only3 comparative results · 18 result-posting studies scanned23 linked records · 16 of 18 completed posted results

At Week 12, 86.4% of people in the Ixekizumab 80mg Q2W group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) With at Least a 2 Point Improvement), compared with 3.4% in the Placebo group—83 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT03364309 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44.9 years (submitted means covering 5,285 participants).
  • 33% of 8,113 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 15 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
calcipotrieneGeneric prescription available1 comparative result · 17 result-posting studies scanned57 linked records · 15 of 51 completed posted results

At 10 weeks, 80% of people in the Calcipotriene 80% group had the submitted improvement result (Physician Global Assessement), compared with 68% in the Vehicle 68% group—12 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT01745133 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 4 · Other organization lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 10

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 47.4 years (submitted means covering 4,433 participants).
  • 39% of 5,269 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
bimekizumabBiologic — brand only4 comparative results · 13 result-posting studies scanned20 linked records · 13 of 16 completed posted results

At Week 16, 81.3% of people in the Bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASI90) Response at Week 16), compared with 0% in the Placebo group—81.3 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT05020249 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 16

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44.9 years (submitted means covering 7,437 participants).
  • 31% of 7,437 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
tofacitinib2 comparative results · 12 result-posting studies scanned15 linked records · 11 of 11 completed posted results

At Week 12, 62.5% of people in the Tofacitinib 10 mg BID group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) at Week 12), compared with 33.3% in the Placebo group—29.2 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT01710046 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 2 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44.6 years (submitted means covering 4,079 participants).
  • 30% of 4,382 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
deucravacitinibBrand-only prescription2 comparative results · 10 result-posting studies scanned27 linked records · 7 of 17 completed posted results

At Week 16, 35.5% of people in the Deucravacitinib group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (s-PGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) With at Least a 2-point Reduction From Baseline at Week 16), compared with 8.2% in the Placebo group—27.3 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT05701995 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 4 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 16

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 45.8 years (submitted means covering 2,581 participants).
  • 32% of 2,581 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
Certolizumab PegolBiologic — brand only4 comparative results · 6 result-posting studies scanned7 linked records · 6 of 7 completed posted results

At Week 12, 72.4% of people in the Certolizumab Pegol 400 mg (ITT) group had the submitted improvement result (Achievement of a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear or Almost Clear at Week 12), compared with 1.7% in the Placebo (ITT) group—70.7 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT00245765 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 2 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 45.6 years (submitted means covering 2,788 participants).
  • 32% of 2,788 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
tildrakizumabBiologic — brand only1 comparative result · 6 result-posting studies scanned13 linked records · 5 of 9 completed posted results

At Week 28, 25.5% of people in the Tildrakizumab 100 mg group had the submitted improvement result (The Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Total mNAPSI at Week 28), compared with 4.2% in the Placebo group—21.3 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT03897075 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 28

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46 years (submitted means covering 2,347 participants).
  • 29% of 2,347 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
tapinarofBrand-only prescription2 comparative results · 5 result-posting studies scanned11 linked records · 5 of 8 completed posted results

At Baseline to Week 12, 40.2% of people in the Tapinarof (DMVT-505) Cream Group group had the submitted improvement result (Percent of Subjects Who Achieve a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement From Baseline at Week 12. Analyses Were Done Using Multiple Imputation), compared with 6.3% in the Vehicle Cream Group group—33.9 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT03983980 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 49.7 years (submitted means covering 1,317 participants).
  • 41% of 1,317 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 4 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
RoflumilastBrand-only prescription1 comparative result · 4 result-posting studies scanned10 linked records · 5 of 7 completed posted results

At Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8, 42.4% of people in the Rofumilast Cream 0.3% group had the submitted improvement result (Number of Participants Achieving Success in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Scale Assessment of Disease Severity at Week 8), compared with 6.1% in the Vehicle Cream group—36.3 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT04211363 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46.4 years (submitted means covering 1,134 participants).
  • 40% of 1,134 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
DesoximetasoneGeneric prescription available2 comparative results · 5 result-posting studies scanned6 linked records · 5 of 5 completed posted results

At 28 days, 30.5% of people in the Desoximetasone Spray 0.25% group had the submitted improvement result (Clinical Success), compared with 5% in the Placebo group—25.5 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT01206387 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 4

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 51.4 years (submitted means covering 294 participants).
  • 40% of 447 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
brodalumabBiologic — brand only6 comparative results · 11 result-posting studies scanned23 linked records · 4 of 13 completed posted results

At 12 weeks, 69.2% of people in the 140 mg Brodalumab group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 12), compared with 6% in the Placebo group—63.2 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT01708629 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 42.7 years (submitted means covering 382 participants).
  • 34% of 592 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
Alefacept1 comparative result · 4 result-posting studies scanned13 linked records · 3 of 12 completed posted results

At Week 16, 22.4% of people in the Alefacept Alone group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at Week 16), compared with 44.9% in the Alefacept + nbUVB group—22.5 fewer people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT00658606 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 4 · Industry lead sponsor · dose comparison

Who was in these trials?
  • 31% of 131 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
tazarotene2 comparative results · 4 result-posting studies scanned7 linked records · 3 of 6 completed posted results

At Week 12, 63.2% of people in the Reference group had the submitted improvement result (Treatment Success Assessed by IGA), compared with 56% in the Placebo group—7.2 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT02886702 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 52.8 years (submitted means covering 1,029 participants).
  • 48% of 1,029 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
mirikizumab3 comparative results · 6 result-posting studies scanned4 linked records · 3 of 3 completed posted results

At Week 16, 29.4% of people in the Induction: 30 mg Mirikizumab group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage of Participants With a ≥90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90)), compared with 0% in the Induction: Placebo group—29.4 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT02899988 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 2 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 16

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46.6 years (submitted means covering 735 participants).
  • 30% of 2,219 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 3 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
ruxolitinibBrand-only prescription3 comparative results · 3 result-posting studies scanned3 linked records · 3 of 3 completed posted results

At From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 84, Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Score for All Treatable Psoriatic Lesions to Day 84 changed by -2.2 score on a scale in the Ruxolitinib Phosphate 0.5% Cream group and -1.1 score on a scale in the Vehicle Cream group—a difference 1.1 score on a scale numerically larger in the selected group.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT00778700 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 2 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44.2 years (submitted means covering 253 participants).
  • 39% of 253 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
CF101Investigational — not approved4 comparative results · 2 result-posting studies scanned3 linked records · 2 of 3 completed posted results

At 12 weeks, 8.5% of people in the CF101 2 mg group had the submitted improvement result (Number of Subjects Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at 12 Weeks), compared with 6.9% in the Placebo group—1.6 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT01265667 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 2 / Phase 3 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 49.3 years (submitted means covering 368 participants).
  • 34% of 368 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
GSK2982772Investigational — not approved1 comparative result · 2 result-posting studies scanned2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results

At Baseline and Week 12, 5% of people in the GSK2982772 960 mg group had the submitted improvement result (Percentage (%) of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal (>=) to 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 12), compared with 0% in the Placebo group—5 more people per 100.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT04316585 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 1 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle · earliest favourable time point: week 12

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 47.1 years (submitted means covering 94 participants).
  • 26% of 94 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
PF-067008412 comparative results · 3 result-posting studies scanned2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results

At Baseline (Day 1 pre-dose), Week 4, Change From Baseline in PASI Scores at Week 4 by Induction Dose changed by -13.2 units on a scale in the PF-06700841 60 mg QD as the Induction Dose group and -4.2 units on a scale in the Placebo as the Induction Dose group—a difference 9 units on a scale numerically larger in the selected group.

One submitted registry outcome, not a pooled estimate — from NCT02969018 details · ClinicalTrials.gov record · Phase 2 · Industry lead sponsor · vs placebo/vehicle

Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 48.4 years (submitted means covering 555 participants).
  • 30% of 555 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
risankizumabBiologic — brand onlyWithin-group result only30 linked records · 19 of 26 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 47.8 years (submitted means covering 3,962 participants).
  • 32% of 6,596 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 16 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
guselkumabBiologic — brand onlyPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study30 linked records · 13 of 20 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44.9 years (submitted means covering 6,901 participants).
  • 33% of 6,903 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 5 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
InfliximabPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study17 linked records · 10 of 14 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 43.4 years (submitted means covering 1,270 participants).
  • 32% of 2,102 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
MethotrexateGeneric prescription availablePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study37 linked records · 8 of 16 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 42.3 years (submitted means covering 1,716 participants).
  • 33% of 2,198 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
ExercisePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study13 linked records · 8 of 10 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 49.6 years (submitted means covering 626 participants).
  • 56% of 774 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 7 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
BetamethasonePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study17 linked records · 6 of 13 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 49.6 years (submitted means covering 2,333 participants).
  • 40% of 2,351 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
ClobetasolPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study15 linked records · 6 of 12 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 50 years (submitted means covering 392 participants).
  • 52% of 499 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 4 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
spesolimabPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study8 linked records · 6 of 6 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 43 years (submitted means covering 292 participants).
  • 66% of 292 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 5 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
betamethasone dipropionate, calcipotriol drug combinationPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study18 linked records · 5 of 13 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 52.1 years (submitted means covering 73 participants).
  • 31% of 809 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
efalizumabPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study17 linked records · 5 of 15 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 45.2 years (submitted means covering 344 participants).
  • 34% of 374 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
halobetasolPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study9 linked records · 4 of 8 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 50 years (submitted means covering 369 participants).
  • 43% of 369 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
CalcitriolPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study7 linked records · 4 of 6 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 11.1 years (submitted means covering 97 participants).
  • 42% of 185 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
FumaratesPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study5 linked records · 4 of 5 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 42.5 years (submitted means covering 479 participants).
  • 32% of 693 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 3 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
betamethasone-17,21-dipropionatePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study13 linked records · 3 of 12 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 50.7 years (submitted means covering 1,873 participants).
  • 36% of 1,873 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
PhototherapyPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study6 linked records · 3 of 5 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46.1 years (submitted means covering 869 participants).
  • 32% of 869 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
crisaboroleBrand-only prescriptionPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study4 linked records · 3 of 4 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46.6 years (submitted means covering 65 participants).
  • 9% of 210 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
belumosudilPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study3 linked records · 3 of 3 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46 years (submitted means covering 156 participants).
  • 54% of 156 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
HydrocortisonePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study3 linked records · 3 of 3 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 43.7 years (submitted means covering 1,272 participants).
  • 42% of 1,312 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
KD025Posted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study3 linked records · 3 of 3 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46 years (submitted means covering 156 participants).
  • 54% of 156 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
AcitretinPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study16 linked records · 2 of 8 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 45 years (submitted means covering 9 participants).
  • 18% of 67 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
Dimethyl FumaratePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study6 linked records · 2 of 5 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 42.3 years (submitted means covering 120 participants).
  • 35% of 330 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
Lasers, ExcimerPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study6 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 43.1 years (submitted means covering 38 participants).
  • 26% of 38 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
TherapeuticsPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study5 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46.3 years (submitted means covering 996 participants).
  • 32% of 996 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
Adrenal Cortex HormonesPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study4 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 43 years (submitted means covering 31 participants).
  • 46% of 46 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
BID protein, humanPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study4 linked records · 2 of 3 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 49.8 years (submitted means covering 626 participants).
  • 38% of 626 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosinePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study3 linked records · 2 of 3 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 49.3 years (submitted means covering 368 participants).
  • 34% of 368 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
ABP 501Posted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44.6 years (submitted means covering 730 participants).
  • 33% of 730 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
BI 695501Posted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 44 years (submitted means covering 555 participants).
  • 35% of 555 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 2 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
OilsPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 41.3 years (submitted means covering 64 participants).
  • 28% of 64 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
ropsacitinibPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 39 years (submitted means covering 109 participants).
  • 21% of 287 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
sodium luminolatePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • 30% of 200 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
SuspensionsPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study2 linked records · 2 of 2 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 47.8 years (submitted means covering 1,261 participants).
  • 37% of 1,261 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
CyclosporinePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study9 linked records · 1 of 7 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • 36% of 239 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 0 studies; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
Betamethasone ValeratePosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study5 linked records · 1 of 3 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 52 years (submitted means covering 24 participants).
  • 33% of 24 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
InjectionsPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study5 linked records · 1 of 4 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 51 years (submitted means covering 11 participants).
  • 64% of 11 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
MidazolamPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study5 linked records · 1 of 5 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 29.1 years (submitted means covering 83 participants).
  • 0% of 83 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.
AbataceptPosted results · no safely mapped effect in any scanned study4 linked records · 1 of 4 completed posted results
Who was in these trials?
  • Average age 46.1 years (submitted means covering 108 participants).
  • 32% of 108 counted participants were female.
  • Race or ethnicity reported in 1 study; skin phototype in 0.
  • Fitzpatrick IV–VI (darker skin) reported: not in any tracked study — the record does not say how well this was tested on darker skin.

02

Who was studied?

Only 9 of 528 result-posting psoriasis studies reported participants’ separately measured skin type. The public record therefore rarely shows whether people with skin like yours were included.

Among 528 completed studies with posted results, this is how often each participant detail was reported.

Age reported — 528 of 528 studies100%
Age reported — 528 of 528 studies
Sex or gender reported — 528 of 528 studies100%
Sex or gender reported — 528 of 528 studies
Race or ethnicity reported — 325 of 528 studies62%
Race or ethnicity reported — 325 of 528 studies
Skin phototype reported — 9 of 528 studies2%
Skin phototype reported — 9 of 528 studies
Who could enrol — eligible age bands (studies)
  • Adults eligible1,525
  • Older adults eligible1,381
  • Children eligible147
Who could enrol — sex eligibility (studies)
  • All sexes eligible1,543
  • Male participants eligible29
  • Female participants eligible8
  • Sex eligibility not reported1

03

Research record

Open the part you need. Every count remains tied to this condition and snapshot.

528 of 1,124 completed trials posted results
528 of 1,124 completed studies posted results47%
528 of 1,124 completed studies posted results

596 completed trials did not post numeric results to the registry as of 2026-09-11. A missing result does not mean the treatment failed; it means the public cannot check what happened.

Among studies that ended at least 12 months ago, 523 of 1,054 (49.6%) posted results.

Who ran the trials and how they were designed

67% were led by industry, usually the company selling the treatment. This is context about who asked the question, not proof that a result is wrong.

Registered trial phases (studies)
  • Phase 3391
  • Phase 2371
  • Phase 4266
  • Not applicable243
  • Phase 1224
  • Phase 1 / Phase 245
  • Early phase 122
  • Phase 2 / Phase 319
Lead sponsor class (studies)
  • Industry1,061
  • Other organization479
  • Other government18
  • U.S. National Institutes of Health12
  • Individual5
  • Research network5
  • +1 more1

Lead sponsor class is not the same as all funding, and it is not a study-quality score.

Timelines and 182 active or recruiting trials

Across 567 primary-outcome time points, the typical trial judged success around week 12. This record does not support a claim of visible results in days.

Registered study starts per year

Psoriasis registered study starts per year, 1995–2026
1995–2026 · 2026: 58

Median study duration: 17 months.

Study starts by year (table)
YearStudy starts
19953
19973
19981
19992
20008
20016
20026
200321
200422
200534
200631
200754
200860
200948
201071
201149
201264
201376
201469
201575
201697
201782
201896
201988
202061
202182
202282
202373
202466
202581
202658
Most-listed study countries (of 73 total)
  • United States668
  • Canada256
  • Germany248
  • China174
  • Poland149
  • France139
  • United Kingdom123
  • Spain100
  • +4 more330

Study locations are not participant nationality or ancestry.

Study counts, sources and limits
clinical trials tracked
1,581
completed trials with posted results
528 of 1,124
submitted enrollment
246,750
active or recruiting now
182

ClinicalTrials.gov data through · methodology v2.1.0 · snapshot 9a17314144e5…

What these figures cannot tell you

  • Registry records are submitted by sponsors and investigators; Skinlogie processes selected fields but does not independently verify every record.
  • Nothing here is a pooled estimate of whether one treatment works better or causes fewer harms — results stay tied to their single study, outcome, comparator, and time point.
  • “Completed” is a registry status, not a judgment of study quality, risk of bias, or selective reporting; posted results are not the complete journal literature.
  • Study counts and research activity measure how much research is visible, not how well a treatment works.
  • Enrollment sums count submitted participant entries, not guaranteed unique people; reported categories cannot show whether a population was representative or whether subgroup findings apply to you.
  • A between-group difference can estimate a comparative effect only when groups and outcome are clear enough; a percentage observed in a single group cannot show what would have happened without treatment.
  • This index cannot decide whether a treatment is safe or suitable for you — that depends on benefits and harms, your preferences, and your health context.

Plain-language definitions

Placebo
A look-alike with no medicine in it, so trials can separate the treatment’s effect from expectation and time.
Vehicle
The same cream or gel without the active ingredient — the fair comparison for topicals, because the base alone can moisturize.
Comparative result
A posted number for the treatment group and a comparison group in the same trial. Only this kind of result can show the treatment itself made the difference.
Primary outcome
The one measurement a trial named in advance as its test of success — harder to cherry-pick than outcomes chosen after the fact.
Phase 3
The large, late-stage trials regulators rely on. Phase 1 and 2 are smaller and earlier; Phase 4 studies happen after approval.
Industry-run
The registered lead sponsor is a company — usually the one selling the treatment. Not proof of bias, but worth knowing who asked the question.
Biosimilar
A close copy of a biologic drug approved as equivalent — the “generic” route for biologics, typically sold at a lower price.
n=
How many people were analysed in a group. Bigger groups give steadier numbers.

Source: official ClinicalTrials.gov search · snapshot · result-mapping layer (v1.1.0, 2026-08-21) · field guide and citation.

Cite or reuse this resultCopy the dated, source-linked sentence

Citation text

As of 2026-09-11, 528 of 1,124 completed psoriasis trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov have posted results, and 23 treatments have a posted result against a comparison group (Skinlogie Evidence Index, https://skinlogie.com/evidence-index/psoriasis).

Skinlogie’s derived figures are licensed CC BY 4.0 — reuse them with this attribution. Source records: ClinicalTrials.gov. Full dataset and citation format →